![]() ![]() Like the big machine the movie gets its title from, the plot keeps spinning at maximum efficiency. Live. It's perfect for your friend who owns the complete Sarah Connor Chronicles on Blu-ray. If you like your sci-fi movies packed with jargon (e.g., ARQ stands for "arcing recursive quine"), frantic running, and a solid twist every 15 minutes, ARQ will be comfort food. It seems that, according to Renton, the bad guys "want the ARQ for their war machine," but every time he re-spawns like a video-game character at the same time and in the same location, he learns that people around him are not who they appear to be. What's causing the loop? It turns out that, besides getting in a workout every day, Renton is the inventor of the ARQ of the title, which Hannah helpfully describes as "an unlimited energy machine that also produces unlimited time." The machine looks like the world's most expensive metal rolling pin. waking up in the same bed again, just before the goon squad arrives again. This ploy ends with Renton getting shot and. wakes up back in the same bed with Hannah. Then the same goons interrupt our hero's morning again, only this time he's prepared and tries to kill the bad dudes. The film opens with our very buff-looking hero Renton (Robbie Amell, from the CW's short-lived time-travel series The Tomorrow People) and his companion Hannah (Rachael Taylor of Netflix's Jessica Jones) getting a harsh wake-up call from a gang of gun-toting goons in gas masks. While trying to escape, Renton falls down some stairs and. Here's the elevator pitch for this movie: Groundhog Day meets Source Code meets Edge of Tomorrow. So, is this curiously named thriller worth your time? We processed some data with our eyeballs to come up with the following questions that will help you decide. (That's shorter than the pilot for The Get Down.) But unlike the trapped-in-a-time-loop characters in this movie written and directed by a former scribe for BBC America's cult fave Orphan Black, you only have so many hours in a day. Here's the good news for busy sci-fi fans: ARQ is less than 90 minutes long. Instead, it's another original movie from the streaming giant, like the recent EDM ensemble piece XOXO, the Ellen Page drama Tallulah, or the many Adam Sandler comedies populating your queue. Unlike the shows that will be twisting up your brain this fall, ARQ isn't a series. But like a streaming Kyle Chandler who gets tomorrow's hot TV trends in his inbox today, Netflix got there first with ARQ, a new time-travel thriller that materialized on the service September 16th. This fall, three time-travel dramas (NBC's Timeless, ABC's Time After Time, and the CW's Frequency) will debut on network television, while Making History, a comedy starring Happy Endings' Adam Pally as a regular guy with a duffel-bag time machine, will premiere on FOX in the winter. If that is the necessary strategy to retrieve a backup, then I guess it's going to cost a hell of a lot more than expected.Unless we're caught in some sort of repeating temporal loop that I'm unaware of, time travel is having a moment. Then Arq can happily access its objects and retrieve the one file you wanted. Not knowing what objects Arq needs, you end up restoring the whole Arq archive from GLACIER to STANDARD. Problem : Arq's objects do not reflect the structure of the files. Knowing that it will take up to 24h to get there. You need first to "restore" the object from GLACIER to STANDARD storage. Then your own storage lifecycle policy would push the objects in the GLACIER class. It has to go first to the STANDARD class.Īrq would put its army of little objects in the standard bucket. One cannot PUT an object directly in Glacier storage. synology has their own hyperbackup software which supports S3, just don't know how reliable of a program it is Way slower this way but I really like Arq's deduplication/encryption and other features. My plan is to use arq to backup the synology from my mac as the syno is mounted as an SMB drive. For example 3 TBs of data backing up once per week, source includes a mixture of small and large files.Īny ideas what the real cost is? I'm thinking scaleaway glacier is a more cost effective option because of the monthly free transfer and cheaper retrieval fees. Backup validation is going to make things costly ĭon't see Arq doing anything wrong here but find it very hard to estimate the true cost of backing up to glacier now.Backup thinning and related operations are chargeable.Arq uses loads of small files - lots of requests.But found out a few things which could increase the costs This needs to be done cheaply so was initially thinking AWS Glacier Deep Archive would make sense at ~1 USD per TB. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |